Details & Links


"Evergreen Gateway" or "Observatory Park" development

County Planning

These active applications are summarized and updated below: Preliminary & Final Plat; Site Development Plan; Grading Permit; Metro District. There have been several iterations of development proposals for these parcels, beginning with the "Evergreen Gateway" concept in 2021, which was withdrawn in 2023. Items related to past proposals, actions, and consequences may be found under the Archive tab.

Note: The owners of El Rancho have said they are investigating moving the "historic part" of the building from the south side of US 40 to the "Observatory" property on the north side of US 40 as an alternative to demolition. There are essential considerations that have not been addressed by the applicants, agencies, or at the County planning level (topography, land area and potentially zoning, infrastructure, water, access, drainage, proximity to I-70). For the El Rancho building and proposed truck stop, see El Rancho/QuikTrip Details & Links. The same owner of the Observatory property continues to advertise "lots" that do not exist and allegedly plans a hotel directly across the road from what would be the largest gas station/truck fueling center in the entire Front Range.

Preliminary & Final Plat:
• Related County policy: Land Development Regulation § 6. Preliminary and Final Plat
Process Guide

(10/8/2024) Case manager response (see SDP, below, regarding pre-application) - Plat
The application process requires public notification, administrative review, and Planning Commission and BOCC hearings. Among other documentation, the following are required: proof of water/sanitation, proof of fire protection and fire protection plan; major transportation study; access permit to state highway; landscape plan.

Site Development Plan:
• Related County policy: Zoning Resolution § 7. Site Development Plan
Process Guide

(10/8/2024) Case manager response - SDP
The application process requires public notification, administrative review. Among other documentation, the following are required: proof of water/sanitation, proof of fire protection and fire protection plan; major transportation study; access permit to state highway; landscape plan; visual analysis; vegetation preservation plan.

(8/6/2024) The owner filed a pre-application for replatting the property to include six lots (#2024 121378 000 00 PA). The narrative submitted reads: "The development is anticipated to subdivide the aforementioned parcels and construct three buildings on the site; a 6,500 SF restaurant consisting of a restaurant, an 18,500 SF hotel, and a 1,600 SF bar. The proposed development includes 181 parking spaces and maintains the two existing access points off of US-40 and Rainbow Hill Road." The illustration shows an 8000 sq ft restaurant, 18,557 sq ft hotel, and 1622 sq ft bar. The area of the proposed development and other lots encompasses land the owner does not yet possess. This latest iteration is notably different from that submitted in February 2024 as a special district application (see below). The narrative refers to assumptions about water/sewer infrastructure that have not been reviewed or approved by the utility provider.

Grading permit application:
• Related County policy: Zoning Resolution § 16. Land Disturbance

(10/31/2024) Planner Klopf returned 2nd Referral comments to the applicant for resubmission of Final Documents. The application remains essentially identical to the original plan.

(9/30/2024) The applicant submitted revised plans to the case manager, including a revised diagram, and describes the operation entailing (cut) 21,593 cubic yards and (fill) 38,963 cubic yards (i.e., more total displacement than the previous version). The illustration still indicates an intention to disturb and bury the majority of the property, including eliminating mature trees.

(6/6/2024): The planner returned comments to the applicant following the 1st Referral review process (see the planner's 6/6/2024 comments here).

(4/29/2024): The application (#2023 138444 000 00 GPA) currently under review has been revised to import about 40,000 cubic yards of fill and cut about 16,000 cubic yards of rock and soil from existing topography. The proposed grading would entail clearcutting and buldozing more than 4 acres of the property, while filling in a natural valley and burying the majority of mature forest under a stockpile more than 600 feet long, up to 33 feet deep, sloping steeply to the I-70 right-of-way, and creating a network of ditches draining to a half-acre sediment basin (image below, and see current plan). The application indicates that additional fill 'may' be necessary, and other documents on file with the County illustrate and describe earthwork entailing more than 71,000 cubic yards and involvement of additional acreage in the envisioned development, however there is still no development plan on file with the County. The justification offered for grading and stockpiling at this time is the present availability of fill from the I-70 Floyd Hill Project.

(November 2023) The owner wrote in a post that he claimed to be factual: "We are being selective and are NOT clear-cutting the site. In fact, we are laying out the site to work around some beautiful Ponderosas on the property." The diagram he had submitted to the County at the time is here. (12/21/2023) Documents initially submitted to Jefferson County and CDOT indicated plans to haul about 94,000 cubic yards of fill dirt, to clearcut and bulldoze more than 6 acres of the property, to fill in the valley to create a platform 30-40 feet above I-70, and to reengineer the natural drainages to a system of two ditches and a large sediment basin at the bottom of the property (see initial plan).

Metro District application:
• Related County policy: Special Districts Policy

(3/4/2024) The Case manager's comments addressed several financial aspects of the application, including requiring an independent market analysis justifying the proposed indebtedness and the ability of the proposed district to repay the debt. The applicant requested, but was not granted, relief from that requirement.

(2/27/2024) The owner has applied to establish a metropolitan district funded by public debt (case #2024 104434 000 00 SV). The application proposes an initial series of bonds in 2025 for $24 million and a second series of bonds in 2035 for a total of $56 million; the owner also envisions imposing public improvement fees (PIF), a form of private tax, on both retail and lodging. The estimated cost of building the infrastructure alone is presented as $27 million. The proposed metro district of potentially 9.2 acres envisions 77,000 sq ft of commercial space, a 140-room hotel, and a 300-400 car parking garage with roads and utilities that exclusively serve those facilities. The "Observatory" properties are already included in water/sanitation, fire, ambulance, and transportation districts, and are adjacent to the Evergreen Parks & Rec district, all of which provide truly public facilities and services that the proposed district does not need to duplicate. Rather than pursuing private financing and forming a traditional POA, which has been the precedent for all other development throughout Evergreen, establishing a metro district (a state-regulated unit of local government) to fund infrastructure and provide management services provides a developer with a tax-exempt financing mechanism. Learn more about special districts and their proliferation here.

Citations:

Code violations (8/9/2024): The owner arranged for about 5000 cubic yards of unscreened fill dirt from CDOT excavations at exit 251 to be delivered, free of charge, to the property at 29259 US Hwy 40 from 7/29 to 8/1/2024. The operation violated certain terms of the access permit and occurred without a grading permit. It generated several code violations, which were cited by Jefferson County as follows (#2024 121813 000 00 CV): "Verified Violations: Stockpile slopes are exceeding the maximum allowed of 3:1 in several locations (16.F.18 of the Zoning Resolution). All stockpiles need sediment control to protect them including the small ones in CDOT ROW (Zoning Resolution 16.F.14.a). Vehicle tracking control needs to be installed for all entrances and exits on the site. Unused entrances need to be blocked with either construction fence or silt fence (Zoning Resolution 16.F.14.J)." The violations were partly mitigated about 6 weeks later.

Permit violation (1/10/2024): The owner began asbestos mitigation work on the Observatory building in mid-October with a CDPHE permit; no demolition permit had yet been issued by the County pending asbestos mitigation. The owner was informed of the need for a County permit, and claimed that he would have all the proper permits; the County permit may be obtained online and involves a $30 fee. The owner initiated demolition of the former Observatory Café building on 1/9/2024 without a permit. A Stop Work Order was issued on 1/10/2024 (#24 100759 000 SW BP). An application for a demolition permit was subsequently filed (#24 100810 000 00 BP).
Related:
Developers demolish vacant El Rancho building, Canyon Courier, 1/18/2024

Grading Violation (11/2/2023): issued by Jefferson County (#23 133091 000 00 CV) for "Land disturbance of property potentially without a permit and not meeting performance standards." CDOT had previously instructed the developer that erosion control must be installed to protect the stormwater drainages from US 40 and I-70, and Jefferson County had previously informed the developer to employ Mile High Flood District Best Management Practices for erosion control. The electric utility, whose line runs through one of the disturbed areas, was neither informed nor gave permission for this work in their right-of-way. No erosion control was installed and no permits were issued beforehand. The owner subsequently contracted for straw wattles to be installed around the newly bladed area intended for dirt stockpiling.

Land disturbance and clearcutting (11/3/2023): On 10/10/2023, Jack and Sherry Buchanan, as "Northstar Ventures Ltd LLC" and its subsidiary "Observatory Holdings LLC", acquired the parcels at 29259-29339 US Hwy 40 through a deed of trust with assign of rents (private lender, Miller Bates LLC of Salt Lake City). Shortly thereafter, the developer began earthwork to prepare for delivery of a "large amount" of fill dirt to stockpile on the property. Along with that, the owner proceeded with heavy equipment to clearcut more than an acre of forest parallel to US 40 (see the developer's own photos).

Media

Letter: An apt phrase is ‘fool’s errand’ (Canyon Courier, 2/1/2024, p.8)

Letter: Density is not in Evergreen’s character, or interest (Canyon Courier, 8/17/2023, p.12)

Letter: Don't Block the View (Canyon Courier, 8/30/2022, p.8)

Letter: In response to Nate Marshall's March 17 letter to the editor (Canyon Courier, 4/15/2022, p.8)

Evergreen "Gateway" (Canyon Courier, 2/2/2022, p.9)

Note: Additional media sources are attached to related subjects under Archive.

Action Items

Open Letter (11/10/2024): Planning must come first
The Grading Permit Application (23-138444 GPA) has been promoted to the Final Documents stage of review. For a half-million borrowed dollars, Observatory Holdings LLC would completely devastate this landscape before any planning processes are brought to bear on actual development plans. The Grading Permit Application is EXCEEDINGLY PREMATURE. This permit must be denied and all disturbance must cease until and unless Plat and SDP applications are complete, submitted, reviewed, and approved. There is no purpose, and no excuse, for proceeding otherwise.

Tell the County you support the open letter, include the link (https://www.save-el-rancho-campaign.com/openletter.html), and address your comments to:
• Lesley Dahlkemper - District 3 County Commissioner (ldahlkem@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Andy Kerr - District 2 County Commissioner (akerr@jeffco.us)
• Abel Montoya - Development & Transportation Director (amontoya@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Chris O'Keefe - Planning & Zoning Director (cokeefe@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Russell Clark - Planning Manager (rclark@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Nick Nelson - Development Review Supervisor (nnelson@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Lindsey Wire - Engineering Supervisor (lwire@co.jefferson.co.us)
• Ross Klopf - Civil Planning Engineer (rklopf@co.jefferson.co.us)

Public Comment (10/21/2024): A Grading Permit Application (#2023 138444 000 00 GPA) for the "Observatory" parcels north of US Hwy 40 is in its 2nd Referral and open for comment through 10/24/2024.

Public Comment (5/15/2024): A Grading Permit Application (#2023 138444 000 00 GPA) for the "Observatory" parcels north of US Hwy 40 is in its 1st Referral and open for comment through 5/29/2024.

Community Response

The following quotes are community responses to the petition, Keep El Rancho Community Use, related to the original (2021) proposal that wanted to destroy public transportation facilities, co-opt a residential road for commercial use, and move emergency services from their long-time, central location.

The proposed development is completely out of character with the current environment and betrays a legacy of good planning.

Please don't destroy the unique character of our community.

We do not want our road to become a thoroughfare.

We recently moved to Rainbow Hill Road for the privacy. This development would negate that entirely.

We just bought our 'forever home' 0.7 miles from El Rancho, and this proposed development is not what we signed up for!

Just moved to this community specifically because of its privacy and quiet residential nature. To have Rainbow Hill Road relocated and made into a commercial main street is a travesty of thoughtful development and would mar this neighborhood unnecessarily.

We own property on Rainbow Hill Rd (since 1970) and would not like to see any more changes to the access.

I have been using and living in this area since 1991 and would love to keep it as it is.

We need to keep big development out of Evergreen. Jefferson County needs to respect the residents ahead of the developers.

People who live here cannot get Jeffco to approve basic permits for anything in a timely manner but somehow things like this and rezoning of private land to commercial always seems to take priority and make it through regardless of how many people do not want it.

No more big developments! This town cannot handle the burden.

Evergreen is a residential community. The only ones that will benefit from this developer overreach are the developers. Reasonable and thoughtful development is good. Projects of this scope are not beneficial to the community of Evergreen.

The concerns, priorities, lives and quality of life of the people of this community should be foremost among planning considerations. The money-making dreams of one individual developer should come last.

There is too much congestion already at the intersection of Evergreen Pkwy and Highway 40. ... This proposal would make this situation worse than it already is. The weekend congestion would become a day to day congestion. This area needs to remain as is for the local community.

Please do not do this. There's no need to direct traffic to this area and increase fire risk. This community does not need to lose any more water and changing the current building would definitely increase water usage.

Increased traffic will make it difficult for the residents to evacuate in the not unlikely event of a wildfire.

There have been 3 fires this month in our neighborhood. I'm concerned about the increased traffic congestion inhibiting a speedy evacuation along with the natural beauty being obscured by commercial lighting and buildings.

The fire safety issues alone are terrifying.

I am worried about water use issues with excessive development in and around Evergreen. Will there be sufficient water to fight a wildfire in this area?

A project of this magnitude will destroy the environment, cause loss of water, interfere with evacuation routes for Evergreen residents, and be a life threatening road block to residents.

The use of this publicly owned land by a private developer is not in the best interest of the community.

Please do not close this RTD Park-n-ride. I use it often because of its ease to hop back on 70.

We do not want to see the Park and Ride at El Rancho discontinued. We are elderly and will increasingly need to use public transport to get to Denver for appointments.

I am completely against this development and the selling of the RTD lot to developers.

I have been here for over 30 years. I have used the Park n Ride and want it to remain in place where it is.

The Emergency Services should not be moved.

Please do not remove any of these: Foothills Fire station, and Alpine Rescue.

None of this is needed. Just redevelop the Observatory land.

Why do we need another hotel.

The hotel will be unsightly and out of character for our residential area.

I question the developer's assessment that Evergreen needs another shopping area and hotel.

Evergreen does not need any further commercial development! Too much traffic, drain on resources and most especially destruction of this beautiful historic area.

Please do NOT go forward with any demolition of El Rancho restaurant and the fire station and park and ride.

Yes please stop with the over development of our beautiful community and to not preserve El Rancho and its history is a crime...

This is a quintessential Colorado restaurant and a historic landmark. It simply cannot be demolished.

Please preserve El Rancho restaurant as a restaurant.

Keep El Rancho!

Let's get a buyer for El Rancho that will keep it a restaurant or gathering place.

Please let us keep our community the way it is and find a way to successfully run the brewery.

El Rancho has been a part of this area for a long time and should remain.

We have a quiet mountain community now and strongly desire to keep our community environment. Please don't change this wonderful community and quiet roads.

Archive

latest propaganda (1/11/2024): The developer claims that he is not pursuing rezoning (Developers demolish vacant El Rancho building, Canyon Courier, 1/18/2024, p.1). In reality, the owner's intention to annex adjacent right-of-way to become part of the development will necessitate rezoning, according to Jefferson County. Although there is still no proposal on file, the owner is currently marketing 7 "lots" for sale or lease that include area of right-of-way he does not yet own (SEE: Evergreen Vacant Land).

latest propaganda (5/4/2023): The original rezoning application has been withdrawn, but the developer still intends to annex almost 3 acres of CDOT-owned right-of-way parallel to Hwy 40 and I-70, which would require rezoning; that application is pending with CDOT. The latest iteration of the proposed development still includes a large (100 room) hotel, proposes a 35,000 sq ft office/retail building, and adds other high-traffic businesses (see Development proposal in El Rancho gets cheers, jeers (Canyon Courier, 5/4/2023, p.14).

ARCHIVED Petition (9/3/2022): Keep El Rancho Community Use
UPDATE 5/7/2023: Facing obstacles from the community, the County rezoning process, water board, fire department, and CDOT, the developer withdrew his rezoning application in April 2023. Thanks to the 119 neighbors and friends who signed to let the agencies know of the community's opposition to the original proposal!

fire station proposal rejected (5/16/2023): The developer was actively pursuing a response from the fire district through at least February 2023, when he appeared at the Board of Directors' meeting and lashed out at the community for its opposition to his proposal; he still refused at that time to provide basic answers regarding the proposed site for relocating the fire station, and refused to discuss the budget for the project (read more about the history of proposals). In April 2023, the fire district's Board of Directors announced that it would delay a vote on the proposal until its May meeting, at least, pending response from the developer to its questions. The Foothills Fire Protection District Board of Directors approved a motion that the FFPD would only reconsider an offer from Northstar Ventures if the following conditions are met: written confirmation from CDOT certifying that the land exchange would be approved; AND specify a specific parcel and final grade for the new station; AND provide a full cost estimate for the construction of the new station, with one of the following financial guarantees: a) an escrow fund in favor of the district for the cost of construction, b) a certificate of deposit in favor of the district for the cost of construction, c) a construction loan to be released as needed sufficient to complete the new fire station; AND a performance bond in favor of the district in the event of default. The board did not set a time limit for future discussion, provided that all of the above requirements are met, and stated that pursuing any offer would also involve a "significant public process."
Related:
Letter: Smoke, Mirrors (Canyon Courier, 1/24/2023, p.8) NOTE: The would-be developer recently accused the author of fabricating this letter to the editor. Read here for his comments and the original sources on which the letter was based.
Eminent Domain in Reverse (Canyon Courier, 6/14/2022, p.9)

Rainbow Hill Road relocation rejected (4/2023): As recently as mid-March 2023, the developer was still actively seeking meetings with the County and CDOT regarding re-routing Rainbow Hill Road through the development as originally proposed. In late April, the County decided not to pursue relocating Rainbow Hill Road. The developer has since withdrawn the original rezoning application and has abandoned plans to relocate the fire station.

Observatory dumpster pollution (2/2023): In the first week of Feb 2023, developer Jack Buchanan hired workers to remove materials, not including asbestos, from the Observatory building. The crew loaded materials into an uncovered dumpster. When the wind blew, pieces of fiberglas insulation became scattered all across the intersection of Hwy 74 and US 40. It was several weeks before those pieces were cleaned up. Buchanan acknowledged the pollution emanating from the dumpster. At a fire district board meeting, he asserted blame for that pollution on the community and agencies whom he believed conspired to prevent the dumpster from being removed. In reality, Buchanan had been instructed by CDOT to move the dumpster immediately because he had not obtained permission to site it in the public right-of-way; he ignored that order for several more days. In the interim, the dumpster was not covered as it should have been according to County guidelines for temporary containers.

revised proposal (12/2022): In 3/2021, the so-called "Evergreen Gateway" proposal sought to take over all the area west of Hwy 74 and north of Hwy 40, intending to take publicly-owned land and demolish community assets for a commercial development (see original plans). A year and a half later, the developer revised his proposal, now planning to site the proposed hotel on Hwy 40. The plans he discussed with CDOT maintained his ambition to relocate Rainbow Hill Road, annex the Park-n-Ride lot, and to annex the rights-of-way parallel to Hwy 40 and I-70. He alleged that he had no plans to relocate the Alpine Rescue Team building (legally, he cannot do so). He again proposed to relocate the Foothills Fire Station to the side of Hwy 40, a quarter mile from its present site. He alleged that he only wanted to use the existing station site as a parking lot and to build alternative access to the hotel. The developer sought concessions from CDOT (an expedited concurrence review process leading to the acquisition of CDOT-owned rights-of-way, and to circumvent the public auction process required by state law), as well as from the County ("setback relief" and expedited rezoning). The revised proposal (see "plans") was not formally submitted to or reviewed by the County.
Related:
Developer Explains Concept for Evergreen Gateway (Canyon Courier, 5/24/2021, p.5)
Hotel, Commercial Development Proposed in El Rancho (Canyon Courier, 3/11/2021, p.1)

RTD El Rancho bus service lost (8/2022): The developer planned to relocate the RTD El Rancho Park-n-Ride lot to a distant location within the proposed development. For six months (2-7/2021), RTD negotiated with the developer to maintain a facility equal to or better than what it already had at El Rancho, but the developer repeatedly would not accommodate the design criteria (including pedestrian access, ADA compliance, number of spaces, and central location) that RTD stipulated in detail. RTD believed that its only recourse was to abandon the site altogether. RTD planners decided in 9/2021 to abandon the El Rancho stops and close the PnR; they subsequently used "low ridership" as the public excuse for doing so on 8/21/2022.

This decision worked in the developer's interest, and subsequently (12/2022) the developer omitted any plan to accommodate public transit at El Rancho while persisting with his intention to destroy the PnR and replace it with a commercial property. The subsequent withdrawal of the original rezoning application and negative County response to relocating Rainbow Hill Road (4/2023) have effectively nullified any remaining ambition to appropriate the PnR for development. Meanwhile, the PnR continues to be used but is no longer being maintained, and there continues to be no bus service at El Rancho. This decision by RTD would not have been made otherwise, and this loss for the community is a direct consequence of the developer's proposal and conduct. See RTD El Rancho closure notes for original sources, more information, and expanded discussion.
Related:
RTD Park-n-Ride at El Rancho Should Remain Open (Canyon Courier, 10/5/2022, p.8)
Eminent Domain in Reverse (Canyon Courier, 6/14/2022, p.9)

Water and sewer Petition for Inclusion (7/2022): One of the first actions the developer pursued was to seek a Submittal Requirements Waiver with a "request to defer submittal of proof of water and sewer (will serve letters) until the second referral of the Rezoning process" (21 130207 000 00 SRW, 9/9/2021); that request was denied. A year later, a Petition for Inclusion (water & sewer) of the fire district's parcel was filed with the West Jefferson County Metropolitan District on 7/6/2022 and heard 7/21/2022; public comment closed 7/29/2022. The developer pushed for a 9/27/2022 decision and unsuccessfully sought to add another petition, without public notice, to include CDOT-owned right-of-way to the same meeting. The water board deferred their decision; no decision had been made, nor was pending, as of 1/3/2023. Related to the withdrawn rezoning application (4/2023), this parcel is no longer sought for the proposed development.
Related:
Letter: Evergreen — it's all your water (Canyon Courier, 8/3/2022, p.8)
Water Complicated for Proposed Development (Canyon Courier, 8/3/2021, p.7)
EMD Updating Water Plan Before Giving the Go-ahead for El Rancho Development (Canyon Courier, 3/31/2021, p.13)